Room 5 room 5
| Afternoon Debate #1: Redefining Severe AS Criteria for Bicuspid Aortic Valve |
|
| 13:20-13:35 |
Introduction: Pressure Gradient Considerations in Bicuspid vs. Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis |
|
| 13:35-13:50 |
Pro: Higher Pressure Gradients Should Define Severe AS in Bicuspid Aortic Valve |
|
| 13:50-14:05 |
Con: Current AS Criteria Should Apply Equally to Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves |
|
| 14:05-14:30 |
Crossfire & Expert Panel Discussion |
|
| 14:30-14:40 |
Voting & Wrap-up |
|
| Afternoon Debate #2: MS Severity Assessment Criteria |
|
| 15:10-15:25 |
Introduction: The Role of Mean Diastolic Pressure Gradient in Mitral Stenosis Assessment |
|
| 15:25-15:40 |
Pro: MDPG Should Be Removed from Mitral Stenosis Severity Assessment |
|
| 15:40-15:55 |
Con: MDPG Remains a Valuable Component in Assessing Mitral Stenosis Severity |
|
| 15:55-16:20 |
Crossfire & Expert Panel Discussion |
|
| 16:20-16:30 |
Voting & Wrap-up |
|
